Why Germany is Backing Away from CETA . . . .

[Oscar]

Why Germany Is Backing Away From a Trade Deal That Lets Corporations Sue the Government

[ http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/2554 ... government ]

Wednesday, 13 August 2014 09:16 By Alexis Goldstein, YES! Magazine | News Analysis

In a move that has many on the left cautiously celebrating, Reuters reported on July 28 that Germany might reject a new trade agreement between Canada and the European Union. [ http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/ ... YO20140726 ]

The deal is called the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, or CETA. It's part of a new wave of large, aggressive trade deals that also includes the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the United States and the European Union, and the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) between 12 countries of the Pacific Rim.

If all the deals passed, they would affect more than half of the world's economy. But the red light from Germany could signal that these agreements are not as inevitable as their advocates suggest.

Germany's objections are centered specifically on the so-called "investor-state dispute settlement" provisions in CETA. These provisions—also known by the acronym ISDS—allow transnational corporations to take legal action against individual governments if they believe that the country's domestic laws violate a trade agreement. And the legal disputes happen through arbitration, which is a way to settle disputes completely outside of the involved countries' courts.

We've seen this movie before. Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) stipulates that three-person panels of private attorneys decide who wins in disputes between corporations and individual governments. [ https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Default ... n-US#A1123 ] These proceedings are closed to public observation. [ http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=1218 ]

The fallout has been dramatic: Corporations have used the NAFTA tribunals to win big-ticket monetary settlements from the taxpayers of nations whose domestic laws interfere with corporate profits. According to a report by the consumer-rights advocacy group Public Citizen, there are 17 pending claims in which corporations are seeking a total of $38 billion through NAFTA and other deals. [ http://www.citizen.org/documents/invest ... -chart.pdf ]

MORE:

[ http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/2554 ... government ]