SMRs(SK): SK universities to examine tech./reg. aspects

SMRs(SK): SK universities to examine tech./reg. aspects

Postby Oscar » Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:51 pm

Researchers at Saskatchewan universities to examine technical, regulatory aspects of small nuclear power plants

[ http://www.fedorukcentre.ca/news/news-r ... pacity.php ]

March 15, 2017

REGINA and SASKATOON, SK -- Equipping Saskatchewan graduate students with the knowledge required to address complex and inter-related technical, regulatory and legal issues is at the heart of a $1.1 million multidisciplinary project funded by the Sylvia Fedoruk Canadian Centre for Nuclear Innovation. The aim of the project, being conducted by researchers from the University of Regina and University of Saskatchewan, is to develop expertise in the engineering, geological, geographical, regulatory and economic factors of building a small modular nuclear reactor in a place that has not previously used nuclear power, using Saskatchewan as its case study.

"Small modular nuclear reactors will inevitably play a role in the clean-energy mix, and it is important to explore and understand their technical licensing processes,” says Esam Hussein, Dean of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Regina and project leader. “This project will build the capacity of Saskatchewan researchers and students to address technical, engineering, and regulatory questions related to introducing this new technology and other novel engineering projects."

“A nuclear power plant project involves a broad cross-section of policy, societal and regulatory issues relevant to the siting and deployment of any large and complex technological project,” says Kevin Schneider, the Fedoruk Centre’s interim executive director. “This project will provide us with a better understanding of issues related to nuclear technology and will help train Saskatchewan experts to know how to deal with those issues, both here in Canada and around the world.”

In December 2015, the Fedoruk Centre sought proposals for a collaborative, multidisciplinary project to investigate the issues related to the siting of a small nuclear power plant in a previously non-nuclear jurisdiction as a case study. The resulting project proposal, led by Hussein, involves 14 researchers from five faculties and departments at the University of Regina and University of Saskatchewan.

The work will be done primarily by graduate students –including three PhD student and at least 13 master’s students -- in areas ranging from geology and geography, to engineering, transportation and law. The project complements the public policy and social engagement research related to energy being undertaken by the Centre for the Study of Science and Innovation Policy at the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, which is also supported by the Fedoruk Centre.

The study will be performed independent of industry to ensure academic independence. It will be guided by the regulations and standards of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s criteria and procedures developed by other jurisdictions.

Small modular reactors are a new class of nuclear power plant that are actively being developed around the world. The reactors’ smaller physical footprints and power output make them better suited for use on smaller electrical grids in concert with renewables, as well as islands and other remote locations where heat produced by the plants can be used for water desalination and heating, in addition to electricity production. Much like airliners, small modular reactors will be built in factories and shipped to where they will be used, rather than being built on site. Innovative designs also take advantage of passive safety systems that can put the reactor in a standby ‘safe mode’ or shutdown altogether without human intervention or external back-up systems.

According to the World Nuclear Association over 45 countries that do not currently use nuclear energy are considering its adoption as an alternative to burning fossil fuels. These countries, as well as jurisdictions in nuclear nations that have not previously used nuclear power, can benefit from the development of a comprehensive approach to the many factors associated with determining the viability of adopting and siting a nuclear power plant. -30-

A backgrounder describing the areas of research that will be done as part of the project is available here:
[ http://www.fedorukcentre.ca/news/news-r ... roject.php ]

= = =

Backgrounder: Saskatchewan university researchers to examine technical, regulatory aspects of small nuclear power plants

[ http://www.fedorukcentre.ca/news/news-r ... roject.php ]

Equipping Saskatchewan graduate students with the knowledge required to address complex and inter-related technical, regulatory and legal issues is at the heart of a $1.1 million multidisciplinary project funded by the Sylvia Fedoruk Canadian Centre for Nuclear Innovation. The aim of the project, being conducted by researchers from the University of Regina and University of Saskatchewan, is to develop expertise in the engineering, geological, geographical, regulatory and economic factors of building a small modular nuclear reactor in a place that has not previously used nuclear power, using Saskatchewan as its case study.

In December 2015, the Fedoruk Centre sought proposals for a collaborative, multidisciplinary project to investigate the issues related to the siting of a small nuclear power plant in a previously non-nuclear jurisdiction as a case study. The resulting project proposal, led by Hussein, involves 14 researchers from five faculties and departments at the University of Regina and University of Saskatchewan.

The study will be performed independent of industry to ensure academic independence. Done primarily by graduate students, the projects deliverables include research papers and a series of maps. The project areas are described below.

Geography: Joseph Piwowar, Canada Research Chair in Geomatics and Sustainability, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Regina

The selection of candidate sites for a small modular reactor is really a spatial task, involving the compilation and comparison of numerous factors using a Geographic Information System computer model. Many of these factors interact in competing ways. For example, proximity to a populated area could, on one hand, be a positive influence in site selection since it would minimize transmission costs, but it could also have a negative impact due to heightened risk sensitivities and to not-in-my-backyard perceptions. Any reactor siting analysis must follow the principles of sustainable development. Thus, the factors should not only include environmental data, such as geology and climate, but also social factors, such as socioeconomic status and public perception, and economic factors, such as construction and operating costs.

“Small modular reactors are a new type of electrical power generators that have the potential to provide consistent baseload electricity without the carbon emissions of coal- and natural gas-fired generators, reservoir flooding of hydroelectric dams, and intermittent power supply of wind and solar systems. Saskatchewan is the highest emitter of particulate matter in Canada (principally from its coal-fired generating stations) while having one of the richest uranium reserves in the word, so it makes sense to explore the potential of small modular reactors for electrical power generation.” - Joe Piwowar

Transportation Routes: Babak Mehran and Satish Sharma, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina

Construction, operation and decommissioning of a small modular reactor, like any industrial plant, requires access to a suitable ground transportation network that can accommodate the size and weight of various components in a safe manner without damaging them. This project aims to develop transportation network analysis methods to identify and rank transportation routes to minimize the travel time between supply locations and the plant site; ensure that routes are suitable for transporting a small modular reactor given its weight and dimensions; and minimize the risks associated with transporting nuclear materials.

“The availability of an efficient ground transportation network is a major parameter for identifying the ideal site for a nuclear power plant as it should provide uninterrupted supply of construction materials, safe transportation of reactor, parts, and nuclear materials. Road geometry (grade and number of lanes) and load bearing capacity of highway infrastructure (such as road pavement and bridges) should be carefully analyzed when identifying the optimal route.” - Babak Mehran

Electrical Engineering and Control Systems: Irfan Al-Anabagi and Doug Wagner, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina; Ramakrishna Gokaraju, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan

This part of the project will look at the feasibility of sites in terms of electrical load demand, grid connectivity, back-up power, and secure communications and control systems based on Saskatchewan’s communications infrastructure. The potential to combine wind, solar and SMR-generated nuclear power onto electrical grids will also be explored.

“SMR power can provide a source for safe, clean power to both remote and urban communities. Building long electric transmission lines involves huge capital costs and poses environmental concerns. Renewable power such as wind and solar provide a source of clean energy but do not provide stable and reliable power to customers. SMR power would help in integrating more renewable power in the grid and to develop microgrids for remote communities.” - Rama Gokaraju

Legal Aspects: Dwight Newman, College of Law, University of Saskatchewan

This research will analyze how pertinent legal requirements affect site selection for a small modular reactor. Some of this work will be on general legal regulation of the nuclear industry. Some will be on how treaty rights bear on the issue. Some will pertain to the law on the Duty to Consult Indigenous communities and how this might affect site selection processes and choices.

“This work will be in-depth research on how the law affects the choices of where a small nuclear plant could go. The work on how Indigenous rights affect the question is particularly important in a province like Saskatchewan in the context of a significant First Nations and Métis population and our developing commitments around reconciliation and working together with our Indigenous communities. If we get this work right, we can also build expertise to help when other places are considering other technologies and can site them in places through processes that are more respectful of Indigenous rights. So, it is about doing things right in Saskatchewan and learning how to help other places engage meaningfully on Indigenous rights as well.” - Dwight Newman
Geological Factors: Stephen Bend, Kathryn Bethune, Janis Dale, Department of Geology, University of Regina

Researchers in Geology are assessing the geological site criteria required for the safe placement of a small modular reactor in Saskatchewan. Designs for SMRs include surface and partial or full underground installations. Thus an understanding of the optimal desired geological features and those that pose high risks are needed to minimize potential hazards and are required in the design of the structure and of emergency response and environmental protection planning.

“The physical geological properties of a site impact the actual and potential hazards to the integrity and safe running of an SMR. This knowledge will inform the optimal site selection from a geological standpoint, the appropriate safety measures, the monitoring required for the safe operation of the facility, the reduction of physical hazards and the implementation of emergency planning and mitigation in the event of failure.” - Janis Dale

Water and Groundwater: Dena McMartin, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina; Grant Ferguson, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan

The University of Regina team will be evaluating the water needs for various small reactor technology options. This will include options for the use of technologies that enhance both efficiency and benefit. The University of Saskatchewan contribution will look at contamination risks to water supplies from a spill of nuclear materials, delineating areas that are most suitable for a power plant from a groundwater perspective.

“With the pace of economic development and growth of water-intensive commercial and industrial projects in Saskatchewan and across the Prairies, and in the context of a changing climate that affects precipitation volumes, timing, and rates, there is significant need to quantify cumulative water requirements and availability, and to determine how our natural water resources may be impacted.” - Dena McMartin

Safety and Emergency Planning: Gordon Huang, Canada Research Chair for Sustainable Communities, and Esam Hussein, Dean of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina

This research will help identify desired sites for small nuclear reactors based on socio-economic and environmental effects. It can also provide a basis for mitigating the related risks through emergency evacuation planning. Safety issues will be considered based on technical regulations and international standards related to the normal operation of a reactor and in the event of an accident. It will consider potential sites in terms of the availability of emergency services, and impact of any released radioactivity on habitats and the environment.

“Risks associated with a small nuclear reactor are related to a number of socio-economic and environmental factors. The results of this project will support risk characterization and assessment.” - Gordon Huang

= = = =

Researchers looking into use of small nuclear power plants in Sask.

[ http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatche ... -1.4031429 ]

Saskatchewan will be used as case study in $1.1 million multidisciplinary project

CBC News Posted: Mar 18, 2017 2:25 PM CT Last Updated: Mar 18, 2017 2:25 PM CT

Researchers from the University of Regina and the University of Saskatchewan are looking into what it would take to build a small modular nuclear reactor in Saskatchewan.

The $1.1 million multidisciplinary project is led by Esam Hussein, dean of engineering and applied science at the U of R. It brings together researchers from five faculties and departments at the universities.

The project is meant to provide the researchers with a better understanding of nuclear energy and to help Saskatchewan graduate students develop expertise around building a small nuclear reactor somewhere that has not previously used nuclear power.
Saskatchewan will be used as the case study.

"Small modular nuclear reactors will inevitably play a role in the clean energy mix, and it is important to explore their technical licensing processes," said Hussein in a press release.

"This project will build the capacity of Saskatchewan researchers and students to address technical, engineering and regulatory questions related to introducing this new technology."

The work will be done by graduate and doctoral students working in the fields of geology, geography, engineering, transportation and law.

Small modular reactors have a physical footprint and power output that make them better suited for smaller electrical grids.
The project is meant to benefit countries considering adopting nuclear power, and aims to provide a comprehensive approach for adopting nuclear energy and siting nuclear power plants.

= = = = =
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8016
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Re: Small nuclear reactor research by SK universities???????

Postby Oscar » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:54 am

Wall's 'backdoor' approach to nuclear power plants in Saskatchewan . . . .

Wadena News April 3, 2017

RE: Researchers looking into use of small nuclear power plants in Sask. CBC News March 18, 2017

[ http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatche ... -1.4031429 ]

While the rest of Planet Earth is developing FREE, SAFE, CLEAN, SUSTAINABLE and RENEWABLE energy sources, Saskatchewan residents are, once again, facing Mr. Wall's outdated attempt to bring us nuclear power plants via the harebrained use of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMRs). This is not 'new technology'; SMRs have been on the back burner for years, waiting for this moment.

Now, disguised as 'research' and 'guided by the regulations and standards of the Canadian nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC), Saskatchewan universities and technical institutions have been sucked into this million-dollar 'backdoor' scheme. Undoubtedly, the uranium industry clings to the hope that this will provide them with even the tiniest bit of the quickly-disappearing market for their deadly product.

Here's the thing: CNSC has certainly not found a safe way to dispose of nuclear waste – lethal for millions of years - so are we now to assume that the proponents of the SMRs have? And, the insane suggestion of taking this technology into developing countries?! . . . to islands?! Think of the convenience of dumping the waste into the nearest river or the ocean in that scenario!

The answer, which is being ignored, to this abhorrent and irresponsible 'dream' of nuclear power in this province - or anywhere in this day of alternative energy - was determined in 2009 during the province-wide Uranium Development Partnership consultations and remains: NO NUKES! . . . regardless of the size of the reactors!!

So, we live in hope that - some how, some day – we'll have a government which will use common sense and discretion in their deliberations as if it were actually part of the 21st century and we can put thousands to work in developing 21st century energy projects!

Elaine Hughes, Chair
Quill Plains (Wynyard) Chapter
Council of Canadians
ARCHERWILL, SK
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8016
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Re: Small nuclear reactor research by SK universities???????

Postby Oscar » Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:21 pm

Sask Party leadership candidate Alanna Koch says world market access is 'key for agriculture'

[ https://www.discoverhumboldt.com/ag-new ... griculture ]

Agriculture News SK October 18, 2017 by Glenda-Lee Allan Vossler

Saskatchewan Party leadership candidate Alanna Koch has been busy on the road talking with party supporters.

During her campaign stop in Swift Current yesterday, she met with about 100 party supporters and members - including some farmers and ranchers.

She says Saskatchewan is the most trade-dependent province in the country with a diverse portfolio of natural resources to manufacturing, adding access to world markets is key for agriculture.

"That’s fundamental considering that we are a giant in exports", Koch said. "I think moving up the value chain, seeing that really exciting change on the value added. I do look at canola and how we’ve seen a transformation of our agricultural economy there, what else can we do on the value-added side, focus on ingredients you know those proteins, starches and oils doing what we can in government to encourage that."

Koch says continued investment in research and innovation is important.

She says we need to make sure agriculture has access to all the tools and technology that we need to have the right kind of regulatory climate which needs to be focused on science.

Koch also talked about the Federal government's carbon tax, which she said she’s opposed to the Carbon Tax noting the carbon tax does nothing to drive down carbon emissions.

"Agriculture has been a solution," she said. "If you think about innovation, what we've done as far as equipment innovation, how we are taking a better more responsible approach to environmental impact form agriculture. You look at our energy centre some of the changes there has been phenomenal in innovation and technology."

She notes Saskatchewan exports uranium to Ontario which allows them to produce clean energy which they get to take advantage of while we are charged for export, transportation and production of uranium.

She says that calculation needs to be reconsidered by the Federal Government
(Emphasis Added. Ed.)
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8016
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Re: Small nuclear reactor research by SK universities???????

Postby Oscar » Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:24 pm

Sask. Party leadership candidates face off in front of packed convention in Saskatoon

[ http://thestarphoenix.com/news/politics ... -saskatoon ]

Alex MacPherson, Saskatoon StarPhoenix | Last Updated: November 4, 2017 7:14 PM CST

Sask Party candidates tell why they should be leader of the party

The Saskatchewan Party’s executive director is defending a leadership campaign debate that left the audience restless and failed to address one of the biggest scandals in the party’s 20-year history.

Held at the party’s annual convention on Saturday, the debate found the five candidates vying to replace outgoing Premier Brad Wall address carbon pricing and health care, among other topics, but not controversial land deals at the Global Transportation Hub.

Tina Beaudry-Mellor mentioned during the debate that the GTH was part of the reason the party has struggled to shore up support in urban ridings, and Gord Wyant told reporters afterward that it is one of the subjects most party members want him to address.

But the party’s longtime executive director Patrick Bundrock said the questions asked at this and two earlier debates were submitted by party members and “chosen across topics of relevance” for the same members, and that all five have previously addressed the scandal.

“There’s still three more debates to go. (We) haven’t ruled out anything yet,” Bundrock told reporters following the debate, which generally featured broad agreement between Beaudry-Mellor, Wyant, Ken Cheveldayoff, Alanna Koch and Scott Moe.

Moe told reporters he and the other candidates are addressing questions on an enormous range of topics — including the ongoing RCMP investigation into the GTH land deals — every day as they travel the province in search of support.

Asked whether the format, in which candidates responded to 10 questions and were able to use a limited number of “interjections,” should be changed to allow for more robust debate, Bundrock said he didn’t think so.

“I thought the format has worked extremely well and we’re beginning to see more of the interjections happen, but … you have five great candidates all talking to the same pool of voters and who agree, probably, on 90 per cent of the issues.”

That was evident on Saturday, as each of the candidates worked to distinguish themselves from the others without straying too far from their basic fiscal conservatism policy positions designed to appeal to the party’s voter base.

(Photo: Candidate Gord Wyant speaks during the Sask. Party leadership debate in Saskatoon on Saturday, Nov. 4, 2017. Kayle Neis / Saskatoon StarPhoenix )

“I think we all have to remember we’re all colleagues on that stage and, at the end of this, we all have to be pulling on the same rope because we’re all members of the same party,” Wyant told reporters, echoing comments made by the other candidates.

There were, however, a handful of new ideas presented at the debate.

Cheveldayoff suggested that the province could consider consolidating healthcare, education and social services into a new ministry aimed at improving the lives of children. Speaking with reporters afterward, he questioned the viability of it.

Koch, meanwhile, told reporters that the province should consider reopening the discussion about using Saskatchewan-mined uranium to fuel nuclear power plants once a new generation of small-scale reactors is sufficiently well-developed. (Emphasis Added. Ed.)

Beaudry-Mellor suggested that MLAs be expected to spend more time in their constituencies knocking on doors, while Wyant proposed moving the party back toward the political centre.

The Sask. Party’s next debate is scheduled for Nov. 16 in North Battleford. The party will elect its new leader at a separate convention in Saskatoon on Jan. 27.

amacpherson@postmedia.com
twitter.com/macphersona
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8016
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Re: SMRs(SK): SK universities to examine tech./reg. aspects

Postby Oscar » Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:38 pm

In response to “Ontario, Saskatchewan eyeing fleet of mini-nuclear for Canada”, The Climate Examiner, May 10, 2017, [ http://theclimateexaminer.ca/2017/05/10 ... ar-canada/ ]

It's still “NO NUKES IN SASKATCHEWAN!”

Published in the Wadena News February 26, 2018 - Page 4

Since learning last year about the $1.1 million case study of the Small Modular Reactor (SMR) being conducted at both of Saskatchewan's universities, the industry has been very active in pushing this 'new' technology forward.

We know that Ontario Power Generation (OPG) has been working with Sask Power to explore a 'pan-Canadian approach' to the development of a 'fleet of small modular reactors' (SMRs) for coal-dependent provinces such as Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Or, to produce the Very Small Modular Reactor (VSMR) suitable to provide electricity to 'far-flung mining operations and remote communities currently dependent on diesel generators in northern Ontario, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut'. Apparently, the industry is concerned with having to deal with multiple First Nations, local governments and environmental institutions, especially the two new federal departments recently put in place to protect Indigenous relations!

All to meet the demand for 'clean electricity' as Canada attempts to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.

However, nothing about Small or Very Small (nuclear) Modular Reactors is clean, sustainable or cheap! Inevitably, taxpayers will be on the hook for the billions needed to realize this pipe dream of a 'fleet' of them scattered across the country which, while being transported on a flat-deck covered with a tarp - look just like a dumpster - quickly and easily installed (underground or in a large storage building) on site!

But, the most sinister aspect remains: there is yet no safe, permanent method of disposal and storage of the radioactive nuclear waste which, regardless of their size, these nuclear reactors will continue to produce lethal material to be stored under- or above-ground, leaking into our air and drinking water, emitting radioactivity for hundreds of thousands – even millions – of years!

Does Saskatchewan's new Premier have the courage and wisdom to put this archaic 'technology' to rest once and for all, say “No nukes in Saskatchewan!” and put our money into developing safe, clean and sustainable renewable 21st century energy?

Or, is that also a pipe dream?


Elaine Hughes, Chair
Quill Plains (Wynyard) Chapter
Council of Canadians
ARCHERWILL, SK
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8016
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm


Return to Uranium/Nuclear/Waste

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron