The Connection between Oppenheimer and Gentilly-2

[Oscar]

The Connection between Oppenheimer and Gentilly-2

by Brigitte Trahan, Le Nouvelliste, August 11 2023

[ https://tinyurl.com/4ndtb4pd ] [Translated from the French]

The release of the film Oppenheimer in cinemas this summer aroused the curiosity of one particular film buff, Montrealer Gordon Edwards, a world-renowned expert on nuclear issues. He's the man [ http://www.ccnr.org/GE_CV.pdf ] the Canadian and Quebec media want to hear from when it comes to nuclear waste, atomic bombs or power plants like Gentilly-2, which Hydro-Québec is eyeing as a solution to its energy shortage.

For the president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, this film was like a trip back in time, because he had the opportunity to confront in person none other than Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb , during a 45-minute televised debate organized in Toronto in 1974. [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZy10obDkoo ]

Gordon Edwards began to become seriously involved in the anti-nuclear camp when India detonated its first nuclear bomb [in 1974]. The Government of Canada had earlier given India a 20 MW nuclear reactor for research, a reactor identical to the one [first built at Chalk River – a site currently making headlines because of the multi-billion dollar legacy of radioactive wastes there], he says. [India used the plutonium produced by that Canadian reactor as a nuclear explosive in its first atomic bomb.]

Plutonium and politics

“All nuclear reactors produce plutonium. It doesn't exist in nature. It is the most commonly used explosive in the world's nuclear arsenal,” he said.

“The first reactors were built for the sole purpose of producing plutonium for bombs. This is the case for [the first reactors at] Chalk River (in Ontario). The idea of ​​turning nuclear energy into electricity came later.” — Gordon Edwards

Despite all the dangers it represents, nuclear energy has continued to develop in the world.

According to Gordon Edwards, the first reason is the manufacture of nuclear bombs. “Nuclear weapons are so powerful. They play a very big role in international politics,” he explains.

A select club

The expert recalls that one of the reasons given repeatedly by Hydro-Québec for not closing Gentilly-2 was that it wanted to maintain a minimum of expertise in Quebec in the nuclear field.

According to him, “when you have a nuclear reactor, you belong to the nuclear club and you are invited to international meetings to which you would not otherwise be invited”.

“It gives political prestige to be part of the club of nuclear powers, that is to say people who have access to plutonium. You can rub shoulders with very powerful people, very powerful corporations.” —Gordon Edwards

Blackening the Oppenheimer Name

After viewing the Oppenheimer film, Gordon Edwards had nothing but good words for the production as a whole. However, he laments that the film “does not state very clearly the real reason why Oppenheimer’s reputation was attacked.

“It almost feels like revenge from people like Commissioner Strauss and Edward Teller when in fact it was all H-bomb related. They both wanted, and Teller in particular wanted, to proceed with a whole arsenal of H-bombs, but Oppenheimer didn't want that. Instead, Oppenheimer said, the time had come for the world to negotiate an end to nuclear weapons and bring them under international control and thus prevent an endless cycle of arms races.

Oppenheimer was an obstacle to the H-bomb project,” explains Mr. Edwards. “That’s why they had to discredit him. And Edward Teller was the one person, more than anyone else in the scientific community, who saw Oppenheimer as an obstacle. He had to blacken his reputation in such a way that no one would listen to him anymore.

The film suggests that it was done for less important reasons,” he notes. Moreover, “the role played by Teller was greatly understated in the film. In fact, his role was much more significant in nullifying Oppenheimer’s influence,” he says.