11 Reasons Why I Didn’t Celebrate Canada Day

[Oscar]

11 Reasons Why I Didn’t Celebrate Canada Day

http://briarpatchmagazine.com/news/?p=465

Mon 2 Jul 2007

By Don Weitz

1. The federal-Harper government’s refusal to honor the Kelowna Accord that would provide over $5 billion in affordable housing, urgently-needed health care and other essential services to many thousands of Aboriginal People, including children, on First Nations reserves; the Accord was signed over 1 year ago by the previous Liberal government, all provincial premiers, and the Assembly of First Nations.

2. The federal-Harper government’s refusal to provide and guarantee clean and safe drinking water and flush toilets on all reserves across Canada.

3. The federal-Harper government’s refusal to provide decent and affordable housing on First Nations reserves, and its continuing refusal to establish a national affordable housing plan.

4. The federal-Harper government’s refusal to establish a national, publicly funded childcare program that would create many thousands of urgently needed publicly subsidized day care spaces for low-income families.

5. The federal-Harper government’s refusal, including the negligence of federal Health Minister Tony Clement, to fully protect Canada’s publicly-funded Medicare by refusing to enforce the Canada Medicare Act by refusing to outlaw and fine private clinics and other private health facilities; a 2-tier healthcare system has become a reality.

6. The federal-Harper government’s offensive military policies and actions in Afghanistan are a failure and have caused many unnecessary deaths of Canadian soldiers, the bombing and torture of Afghan civilians, and have irresponsibly wasted hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars.

7. The Martin-Liberal and Harper-Conservative governments’ failure to provide national public debate on its militaristic plans and combat role in Afghanistan before ordering thousands of soldiers to that country - a blatant violation of the democratic process.

8. The federal-Harper government’s refusal to order drug companies to send affordable, urgently needed AIDS drugs to many African countries where HIV-AIDS has become a devastating continent wide epidemic that has already killed millions of people. So far, not one promised AIDS drug has been shipped to Africa.

9. The federal-Harper government’s refusal to honor the international Kyoto Agreement that requires nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that are causing catastrophic climate change by specific dates.

10. The federal-Harper government, like previous liberal governments, has seriously violated and continues to violate the civil and Charter rights of many citizens — such as enforcing its anti-terrorist laws that unjustly deprive thousands of citizens of their legal and Charter rights that have resulted in wrongful conviction, indefinite imprisonment, deportation, and torture of many innocent people it has labeled “terrorist” or “terrorist suspect.”

11. The federal government supports Canada’s repressive provincial “mental health” laws that authorize preventive and indefinite detention (”involuntary committal”, “warrant of the lieutenant governor”,”community treatment order”), and health-threatening psychiatric procedures such as forced drugging (”medication” without informed consent), electroshock (”ECT”), physical restraints, solitary confinement (”seclusion”), and other violations of human rights.

Don Weitz is a social justice and antipsychiatry activist, host-producer of “Antipsychiatry Radio” on CKLN, and co-founder of the Coalition Againsty Psychiatric Assault (CAPA); he was recently presented with an Award in Advocacy by the Mental Health Legal Committee in Toronto.

[Oscar]

May 15, 2008

Mr. Breitkreuz

Having lived and worked overseas, I can speak from personal experience on how, only a few years ago, Canadians were openly and joyfully welcomed, respected, appreciated and trusted.

However, before deciding to live overseas today, I would be very careful about choosing my destination. I do not feel confident that I would be treated the same way as before – if I told anyone at all that I was a Canadian.

We are destroying ourselves, in every way, in the eyes of our own people and in the eyes of the world: socially, environmentally, ethically, morally…

It’s not easy being proud to be Canadian these days!

Elaine Hughes
Archerwill, SK

===========================================

----- Original Message -----
From: Joan Russow
To: Brent Patterson
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [coc-chaps-l] NEWS: Canada may not seek UN Security Council seat

RE: UN Security Council bid: Canadian Conservatives dilemma- to seek and fail or not to seek at all.

The "New" Conservative government is seeking a bid to become a member of the UN Security Council. It has been reported in the Globe and Mail that the Canadian government might not obtain the 2/3 required majority vote from the UN General Assembly. Will it resort to US' Bribe, Intimidate and Cajole (BIC) tactics-

The article in the Globe indicated that Diplomats at Canada's permanent mission to the United Nations in New York have begun what has been described as a "relatively low-key bid to build support among the 192 among…UN members" and they are waiting "to ramp up efforts into a full-blown campaign" Is this campaign a euphemism for riveting up the traditional US' "Bribing, Intimidating and Cajoling" BIC tactic.

There have been classic US BIC campaigns at the UN: from Bush the First in 1991, when Yemen voted against the invasion of Iraq, the US declared that "it was the most expensive decision that Yemen had ever made": To Bush the Second in 2003, when the US sent out an intimidating letter to all members of the UNGA, calling upon them to oppose the invoking of the Uniting for Peace Resolution to set up an emergency session of the UNGA to address the issue of the US' imminent invasion of Iraq. Even expressions like the US is "leaning" on Guinea when Guinea chaired the UN Security Council prior to the invasion of Iraq. Etc.

The "New" Conservative government has deluded the Canadian citizens about the international support for its various positions and actions, including its invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and its other egregious votes related to climate change, the rights of indigenous peoples, the right to water, the banning of depleted uranium, and its biased middle east policy etc.

The Conservatives now are caught in a dilemma if they go ahead with their bid to be elected to the UN Security Council it is doubtful that they will receive the required 2/3 vote from the UN General Assembly. Thus the "new" Conservative government's spurious claim of international support will be finally be debunked

Or they withdraw their bid, and will have to rationalize their withdrawal through "sour grapes", which will re-enforce the extent to which Canada is now perceived to be an international pariah.

Joan Russow
Vancouver

===============================

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Brent Patterson <bpatterson@canadians.org> wrote:

Dear chapter activists,

As reported on the front-page of today's Globe and Mail, "Stephen Harper's government is expected to decide this week whether to pull Canada out of the race for a seat on the United Nations Security Council in 2011-12 because of fears the country might suffer an embarrassing loss on the world stage, sources say. Canada has in the past won election to the UN's most powerful body roughly every 10 years, and served notice back in 2001 that Ottawa would vie for another two-year term when the election is held in 2010. Behind the scenes, Canadian diplomats have expressed serious concerns the bid might fail, leaving the Conservative government to decide whether to brave potential embarrassment."

The article notes that, "Canada faces a three-way race, against Germany and Portugal, for the two seats up for grabs in the UN 'regional' block," with Germany considered a "shoo-in for one of the seats" and "Portugal is expected to win support with a 'small country' campaign."

Significantly though, "Canadian government officials and diplomats were not willing to speak publicly about the decision, but some UN watchers said Canadian foreign-policy shifts might make it harder to win two-thirds support of UN countries." The article lists those "shifts" as Canada's votes on the Middle East, its climate change policy, the policy of aid concentration to fewer countries, and its de-emphasis on multilateral foreign policy.

The article doesn't mention Canada's refusal to recognize the right to water, as Maude Barlow highlights in this Toronto Star editorial, http://www.canadians.org/media/council/ ... ar-08.html. Commenting on the recent United Nations Human Rights Council session, Maude writes, "This is the third time in six years that member nations of the UN have pushed for recognition of the human right to water. On each occasion, Canada has rejected the efforts to have water recognized as a right."

Nor does it reference "the Harper government voting against the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples on September 13, 2007 along with the U.S., Australia and New Zealand, while 143 countries voted in favour of the Declaration." Our media release on this can be found at http://www.canadians.org/media/other/20 ... pt-07.html.

The full article is at http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/
RTGAM.20080514.wseat14/BNStory/National/home.

Thanks,
Brent

Brent Patterson
Director of Campaigns, Organizing,
& the Blue Planet Project
The Council of Canadians
700-170 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5V5
1-800-387-7177 ext. 291
bpatterson@canadians.org
www.canadians.org

[Oscar]

Canada Day 2008: 91 Plus Reasons to Not Celebrate to Complement the Dominion Institute’s “101” things

-PEJnews-Joan Russow-Global Compliance Research Project.

No amount of gun salutes, military fly-overs, fire works, with song, music and dance, and flag waving can eclipse what has been really happening in Canada

No amount of nice sounding rhetoric such as in the minority government’s 2007 Speech from the Throne, comparing “Canada to the guiding light of the North Star”, can prevent Canada from now being perceived as an international pariah of corporatism and militarism.

No painting of the Maple Leaf on the C-17 planes of Canada One, will prevent Canada from being ready to go anywhere, any place and at any time at the behest of the US policy of preventive/pre-emptive aggression.

www.PEJ.org

For Canada Day, the Dominion Institute has undertaken a national survey of what Canadians feel are the 101 people, places, symbols, events and innovations that most define Canada.

To complement this list, 73 etc. actions resulting from Canada’s militarism and corporatism have been added below.

In the Canadian government’s increased integration with the US military and corporate policies, Canada has increasingly become an international rogue state, contributing to war and conflict, violating human rights, denying social justice, and destroying the environment.

As a result of Canada’s closer military integration with US policy, the Canadian minority government, while claiming that it is a major international player, has lost support from the larger global community. Canada is aware that it would not be able to garner international support from the UN General Assembly, which represents the sovereign equality of states, to obtain a seat on the UN Security Council. The only way Canada could obtain a seat is by resorting to the US Bribe, Intimidate and Cajole (BIC) Tactics.

EXHIBITING DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT

(1) Canada is in a constitutional crisis because, under the Canadian constitution, a minority government can speak on behalf of Canada. Normally, in the past, minority governments generally have the support of at least one of the opposition parties. Currently, in Canada, the “new” Conservative minority government does not have real support from any of the opposition parties.

(2) Canada has a minority government acting as a majority government, through its disregarding majority votes and through its declaring of motions as non-confidence motions. Under the Canadian Constitution, an international agreement can be ignored, adopted, signed, or ratified simply by the agreement of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; this means that, even though the three opposition parties representing two thirds of the electorate are opposed to the government’s position, the minority government can bind Canada, internationally.

(3) Canada, under the Conservative government, has refused to respect and act on the majority vote in parliament. For example, on May 8, 2007 two thirds of Parliament endorsed the majority report from the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration; this report supported the request by war resisters to remain in Canada. The Conservative government will not respect the majority vote in Parliament.

(4) Canada has less than 27% of women elected to the Parliament. In a publication prepared under the Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the various states were listed according to the percentage of women elected to the national legislatures; the list stopped at 27% thus Canada was not included on the list.

PROMOTING MILITARISM

(5) Canada has overtly engaged in "Operation enduring freedom" against Afghanistan and covertly in "Operation Iraqi Freedom" against Iraq;

(6) Canada has supported the invasion and occupation of another sovereign state under the guise of self defence, of "preemptive/preventive" attack, of "humanitarian intervention: or of the responsibility to protect. Canada has accepted the misconstruing, by the United States, of Article 51 (self defence) of the Charter of the United Nations to justify premeditated non-provoked military aggression;

(7) Canada has continually supported the using of "9-11" as a justification for military aggression, for redefining torture and violating the Convention against torture; and for denying fundamental civil and political rights.

(8) Canada, under the Conservative government, has abandoned Canada’s long standing role of a sanctuary for those opposed to war.

(9) Canada has continued to be a member of NATO, with its first strike policy, and with its belligerent and offensive operation, “Bomb, Blast and Bribe” Operation in Afghanistan.

(10) Canada has substantially increased its military budget to over 10% of the annual revenue available for Federal government programs;

(11) Canada, to promote its increased spending, has given a grant of $500,000 to the Canadian Defence Association Institute's (CDAI) and the Conference of Defence Association (CDA). On May 16, 2008, it was revealed that the Conference of Defence Association (CDA) and its charitable front group, the Conference of Defence Association Institute, had received $500,000 from the “new” Conservative government to legitimize the Federal Government’s annual Defence spending, and the government’s recently announced Canada First $30 billion anticipated future budget along with the $45 billion retrofit budget. In the Covenant for the $500,000 grant, the CDA and the CDAI are linked in the application.

"As a recipient, the CDA, with the support of its charitable wing, the Conference of Defence Associations Institute (CDAI), will promote exchanges on security and defence issues among its membership, decision makers, the media and the broader Canadian public. As a result of these activities, the CDA will educate its members and the broader public on defence issues relevant to Canada."

Under this Covenant between the government and the CDA/CDAI to receive the grant, the CDA and the CDAI must fulfill the following "charitable" actions: The CDA (or the CDAI) will undertake the following activities in each fiscal year:

1. Provide tangible input into legislative and policy governmental work.
2. Secure a minimum of 24 extended invitations to CDA staff to
participate in meetings or briefings.
3. Maintain a minimum of 12 member associations.
4. Maintain a minimum of 17 associate member associations
5. Maintain a minimum overall membership of at least 100,000 members.
6. Attain a minimum of 200 requests for information
7. Attain a minimum of 29 media references to the CDA by national or regional journalists and reporters.
8. Attain the publication of a minimum of 15 opinion pieces
(including op-eds and letters to the editor in national or regional)

(12) Canada has engaged in military exercise such as Trident Fury and Exercise Amalgam/Falcon Dart Northcom; flagrant display of propaganda of war (in violation of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits propaganda of war);

(13 ) Canada has welcomed US nuclear powered and nuclear arms capable vessels into the Canadian harbours of Greater Victoria, and Halifax..

(14) Canada has continued to permit US nuclear powered and nuclear arms capable vessel, such as USS Abraham Lincoln into the harbour of Greater Victoria Canada. This vessel is the infamous vessel from which President Bush proclaimed US Victory in Iraq. The intrusion into Canadian waters by U.S. nuclear powered and nuclear arms capable vessels contravenes obligations to prevent disasters, commitments to eliminate weapons of mass destruction, and the 1996 decision by the International Court of Justice that the threat to use or the use of nuclear weapons is contrary to International Humanitarian law.

(15) Canada has continued to support NATO which still neither confirms nor denies the existence of a first strike nuclear policy;

(16) Canada has agreed to an enhanced role for NORAD.

(17) Canada has engaged in military exercise such as NATO’S Trident Fury or Northcom’s Exercise Amalgam/Falcon Dart.

(18) Canada, with its JTF-2 commandoes, has, along with British and US soldiers, conducted secret nightime raids and execution missons in Afghanistan, resulting in numerous civilian casualties

(19) Canada has appointed Lt.-Gen. Walter Natynczyk who was groomed at U.S. Army War College whose " ultimate purpose of land power is to support U.S national objectives in a joint, interagency, and multinational environment; and who was made deputy commander of the multi-national corps (Iraq) in operation Iraqi Freedom [in a war in which Canada refused to overtly participate]

(20) Canada has continued to be a major supplier of uranium and of CANDU nuclear reactors and as such has directly or indirectly or through the “fungibility principle” contributed to the production of nuclear arms.

(21) Canada is estimated as the sixth largest exporter of arms and has continued to profit from the sale of arms.

(22 ) Canada has been complicit in the development and use of weapons such as Depleted Uranium and cluster bombs that would be prohibited under the Geneva Protocols

(23) Canada has failed to denounce the hypocrisy of the US opposing the possession of nuclear weapons by certain states but failing to criticize the destabilization of the Middle East through the Israeli possession of nuclear arms.

(24) Canada has failed to criticize the Israeli strike on Syria and has not come out in opposition to the dangerous precedent set by the US in the US adoption of the policy of “preemptive strikes” against states that pose a threat to the United States. [It was reported that, on September 6, 2007, Israel struck a facility in Syria].

(25) Canada, through the acceptance by Harper of an “international” human right award, has abandoned Canada’s less biased position in the Middle East. Harper’s award was based on the following:

 Unequivocally supporting Canada's role in the UN-sanctioned mission in Afghanistan;

The US Invasion in Afghanistan was an act of US revenge in violation of International law, and never sanctioned by the United Nations, and was a misconstruing of article 51-self defence. When NATO became involved, the UN gave conditional support providing the Operations complied with the Charter of the United Nations. One of the purposes of the United Nations is to comply with international law. The ISAF NATO operation, along with Operation Enduring Freedom, have violated several Geneva Conventions through the treatment of prisoners and the use of prohibited weapons, and more recently been condemned by the UN of night-time raids resulting in civilian deaths

 Refusing to sign a resolution denouncing Israel's right to self-defence at the 2006 Francophonie Summit;
Harper has failed to denounce the hypocrisy of the US opposing the possession of nuclear weapons by certain states, but failing to criticize the destabilization of the middle East through the Israeli possession of nuclear arms.

 Suspending relations with the then Hamas-led government in Palestine for its refusal to renounce terrorism; and

Harper has demonstrated not only disregard for democracy in Palestine but also in Canada by signing or failing to sign international agreements that have been supported by all opposition parties representing two thirds of the Canadian Electorate

 Delivering a heartfelt apology acknowledging the overtly discriminatory Indian Residential Schools program.

Harper's government was one of three states that refused to ratify the International Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Though the apology is long past due, it does not make up for the continued violation of the social and cultural rights, the right to self-determination, the right to safe drinking water etc, of indigenous peoples in Canada.

(26) Canada has not supported the setting up, by the United Nations General Assembly, under Article 22, an international Tribunal to try the Bush Regime for Crimes against the peace

DEMONSTRATING DISDAIN FOR THE RULE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

(27) Canada has demonstrated disdain for the international rule of law, by refusing to accept the jurisdiction or decision of the International Court of Justice;

(28) Canada has extended "human security" to mean "humanitarian intervention" and "Responsibility to protect" and created the licence to intervene militarily in the name of humanitarian intervention;

(29) Canada, through transferring prisoners, has violated the Convention against Torture

(30) Canada has violated the Geneva conventions on the treatment of civilians, and international human rights and humanitarian law during the invasion and occupation of sovereign states;

(31) Canada has signed and ratified international conventions, treaties and covenants but has failed to enact the necessary statutory legislation to ensure compliance. [Even though in 1982, Canada sent a Communique internationally indicating that when Canada signs an agreement it ensures that the necessary legislation is in place, and in the event that there is a discrepancy, Canada will enact implementing legislation;


TRUMPING CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

(32) Canada has obsequiously drafted the Canadian model of “homeland security act” in the drafting and enforcing of the "anti-terrorist Act" which has contributed to racial profiling.

(33) Canada has violated the civil and political rights of its citizens by instituting a copy- cat no-fly list, and by relying on FBI lists of Activists to prevent their entry into Canada

Canada has also embarked upon caving in to US paranoia by contributing to a North American Fortress and has agreed to develop, enforce intrusive identity measures such as biometrics;
Canada has recently undertaken in Kelowna a pilot project of Body Scanning.- virtual stripping” through a device that penetrates clothes;

Canada has permitted a pilot project for the “virtual stripping” of citizens through a device that penetrates through clothes.

(37) Canada, has used the RCMP, as agent provocateurs, to target activists opposed to government policies at conferences, such as APEC, and the SPP,

(38 ) Canada has placed citizens, engaged in lawful advocacy, on RCMP Threat Assessment lists.

(39)Canada has equated lawful advocacy with criminal acts in violation of the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act

(40)Canada has exchanged “caveats down”, “intelligence” information with the US; this misinformation has led to “rendering” of citizens to states which permit torture

(41)Canada has failed to condemn to redefinition, by the US, of what constitutes torture

(42) Canada has been implicated in intruding and intervening, through questionable institutes, in the electoral process in sovereign states


PRATICISING ANTI-ENVIRONMENTALISM

(43) Canada has condemned and prosecuted citizens for attempting to prevent irreparable harm to the environment and for calling upon governments and the courts to respect the rule of law.. Since the arrests in Clayoquot Sound and subsequent arrests of citizens protesting the destruction of the forests, concerned citizens have been asking ”Who are the real criminals?’ The Court must end designating , as criminals, those who strive to respect international obligations, and begin charging the corporations who continuously disregard the rule of law, and the long-standing obligations towards the Environment.

(44) Canada has for years ignored the warnings of the Intergovernmental panel on
Climate change, and disregarded its obligations under the Framework Convention on Climate Change and refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol;

(45) Canada, at the International Conferences on Climate Change, has stalled international resolve to address the issue of climate change;

(46)Canada has even ignored the serious short term and long term consequences of nuclear energy and advocated that civil nuclear energy is the solution to climate change.

(47)Canada has promoted two questionable “solutions” to climate change: Nuclear and biofuel, and ignored the principles that a “solution” should never be equally bad or worse than the problem it is intended to solve;

(48) Canada has failed to call for states to release information related to the greenhouse gas emissions from the production of all weapons systems, military operations and interventions, military exercises, weapons testing, military aviation, environmental warfare, troop transfer, waste generation, reconstruction after acts of violent interventions etc;

(49) Canada has either not been invited or refused to participate in the German government initiative to establish an International Renewal Energy Agency (IRENA). the ”preparatory conference for the foundation of the international renewable energy agency (IRENA)” took place in German on April –09 –11, 2008, there were 170 participants from 60 countries attended and discussed the possible objectives, activities, organisation and finance of IRENA. Canada was not one of them

(50) Canada has continued to transfer to other states, substances and activities that are harmful to human health or to the environment and to justify this transfer through the notion of "informed consent";

(51) Canada collaborated with the US in the gutting and discarding of the precautionary principle which reads where there is a threat to human health or the environment, the
lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing measures to prevent the threat;

(52) Canada has continued to the destroy biodiversity not only in Canada but even in the United States, through the transboundary impact on the Canadian company, Cominco;

(53) Canada has instituted major environmental awards, such as the Canadian Environmental Award, and permitted major polluters, such as Shell and Nexen to sponsor the event, and thus has condoned “green wash”.


UNDERMINING FOOD SECURITY AND WATER AS A PUBLIC GOOD

(54) Canada continues to be a major producer, and promoter of genetically engineered foods and crops which has led to a deterioration of the food supply, and of heritage seeds;

(55) Canada also has used the WTO to undermine European opposition to genetically engineered foods and crops;.

(56) Canada has participated in the export of genetically engineered corn into Mexico when, under NAFTA on January 1, 2008, the Mexican border was opened to genetically engineered corn;

(57) Canada has supported corporate demands for an acceptance of a high percentage of “adventitious” material in containers previously used for the transport of Living Modified Organisms;

(58) Canada voted against the declaration of Water as a Human Right, at the reunion of the UN Commission on Human Rights in Geneva

(59) Canada has increasingly resorted to “public private partnerships” ( 3 Ps) to fund and operate the commons in areas of “drinking water and sewage”

(60) Canada has permitted the salmon Aquaculture, which has impacted on wild salmon;

(61) Canada has used the “extraterritoriality” principle to justify environmentally destructive mining practices in many parts of the world;

(62) Canada, through the Security and Prosperity Partnership, and NAFTA has been harmonizing standards leading to the lowest common denominator, and has been relaxing regulations

EVADING HUMAN RIGHTS

Social and Cultural Rights

(63) Canada has failed to incorporate provisions from the International Covenant of Social, Economic and Cultural Rights in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.


(64) Canada has failed to implement into statutory legislation the guarantees under the Covenant of Social, Economic and Cultural Rights to the right to food and the right to housing, both vital determinants of citizen’s health;

(65) Canada has failed to act on the international commitment to transfer .7% of the GDP for overseas aid,

(66) Canada has failed to seriously advance the cancellation of third world debt;

(67) Canada has reduced funds for universities, causing universities and researchers to grovel for corporate and defence funding

(68) Canada has condoned the corporate funding of higher education and the corporate direction of research;

(69) Canada, through the appointment of general Rick Hillier, former Canadian
Chief of Defence staff, as Chancellor of Memorial university; reflects the reifying of the “inBEDedness” of the military in academia, and of the disconcerting revolving academic/military door.

(70) Canada is moving progressively away from its national policy of universal accessible, non-two tier, not for profit health care system.

(71) Canada has, through the election of Dr.Brian Day, as President of the Canadian Medical Association could be moving more towards condoning private facilities:
In a November Address to the Canadian Medical Association stated the following: “Frustrations with wait lists led me, in 1995, to found the Cambie Surgery Centre in Vancouver - the first private facility of its type in Canada”.

Labour Rights

(72) Canada, has failed to sign and ratify most of the International Labour Conventions (ILO).

(58) Canada has failed to institute a Fair and just transition program for workers to move away from activities that are harmful to the environment and to human health.. Since the emergence of concern about the environment in the 1970s, many union members anticipated that there would be the phasing out of industries for environmental reasons, and they began advancing the principle of fair and just transition.

Indigenous Rights and Rights of Migrant Workers

(73) Canada, on September 13, 2007, failed to adopt the International Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Canada was one of only four states that refused to adopt the declaration; subsequently with the change in government in Australia, Canada is now one of three states that did not adopt the Declaration;

(74) Canada cannot be absolved from the continued exploitation of aboriginal by apologizing, though important, to the First Nations peoples of Canada,

(75) Canada has allowed the situation of indigenous peoples in Canada to deteriorate to such an extent that first Nations are often desperate enough to enter into agreements with industries that exploit resources of the land in a way that is destructive to the environment and culturally inappropriate

(76) Canada has refused to ratify the International Convention on the Protection of Migrant Workers and their Families


FLAUNTING CORPORATISM

(77) Canada has continued to promulgate globalization, deregulation and privatization
through its support for trade agreements, such as the WTO/FTAA/NAFTA, SPP;

(78) Canada has advocated and supported the IMF’s structural adjustment program which has resulted in serious deterioration of social services and exploitation of the resources of vulnerable peoples around the world;

(79) Canada has entered into the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), with the US and Mexico, which will contribute to the increased violation of international peremptory norms, and lead to the relaxing of health and environmental standards through “harmonization of standards”.

(80) Canada has been increasingly willing to provide “reliable energy” to the US regardless of health or environmental consequences;

(81) Canada has ignored even the NAFTA provision to not relax environmental standards to attract industry

(82) Canada has, on the other hand, always relied on what has been described as the “proportionality” principle which it claims would require, regardless of the environmental consequences to continue to export the same proportion of energy.

(83) Canada, in its 1993 Environmental Assessment of NAFTA, claimed that Canada’s international environmental obligations would take precedence over NAFTA; yet Canada has not used the Convention on Biological Diversity which Canada has signed and ratified, to counter any corporate claims against Canada.:.

(84) Canada has increasingly succumbed to US corporate take-overs of Canadian industry.

(85) Canada has promoted the privatization of public services such as water, and health care,

(86) Canada has advocated corporate voluntary compliance rather than instituting
Mandatory International Ethical Normative (MIEN) standards and enforceable regulations to drive industry to conform to international law

(87) Canada has failed to revoke licences of corporations that have violated human rights, destroyed the environment, contributed to war and conflict, and denied social justice

(88) Canada has condoned and actively facilitated corporations benefiting and profiting from war;

(89) Canada is willing to sacrifice the environment, in the oil sands, to satisfy US energy wants and is indirectly contributing to US military production

(90) Canada has engaged in flawed consultation process in the oil sands, and conveyed an “over the top” rhetorical “vision” statement: Our vision for oil sands development leads to a future for Alberta that:
•Honours the rights of First Nations and Métis
•Provides a high quality of life
•Ensures a healthy environment
•Maximizes value-added in Alberta
•Builds healthy communities
•Sees Alberta benefit from the oil economy and lead in the post-oil economy
•Sees Alberta as a world leader in education, technology and a skilled workforce
•Provides high quality infrastructure and services for all Albertans
•Demonstrates leadership through world class governance (agreed to by the committee of the consultation process)

(91) Canada has directly or indirectly subsidized companies that have developed weapons of mass destruction, that have violated human rights, that have denied social justice, that have exploited workers, that have destroyed the environment;

etc

In 2008, on Canada Day, there is nothing to celebrate. Perhaps next year.