ARNEY: Isreal taking over Canada?

[Oscar]

Isreal taking over Canada?

From: Jeremy Arney
To: Day, Stockwell
CC: All MPs
Sent: April 02, 2009 10:16 PM

Mr. Day,

In the last two days, I have heard two things that anger and disgust me:

1: You have entered into an agreement with Israel that will allow them to be a part of, and control part of, and determine policies concerning our Canadian Border Service Agency.

Does this mean that Israel will be able to stop anyone from a country which they believe may not like them or support their war activities against women and children from coming to Canada?

They (Israel) have already done so with George Galloway and so I have no reason to believe they (Israel) will not have the authority to stop anyone else.

Why are you not only allowing but encouraging such a thing to happen?

It certainly is not in the best interests of the Canadian People, which your leader and all his ministers keep parroting (along with transparency) as one of your main objectives.

2. Jewish Defence League of Canada director, Meir Weinstein, said today that any Canadian Organisation or individual that invited George Galloway to speak in Canada later this month would be looked into regarding their ties to terror groups.

"We want to make sure that the hate the Hamas organisation teaches will not reach children in Canada" he said during an interview with Channel 4 News in the UK.

He also said speaking from the CBC Headquarters in Toronto that: "If Galloway attempts to speak in Canada via any other means. the JDL will see to it that the Canadian Government will be monitoring every individual and organisation that has anything to do with George Galloway".

Sounds like a terrorist group to me, threatening the Canadian People and ordering our Government to do their bidding.

From these two items, it is clear that somehow Israel now controls your Ministry instead of Harper. Is Harper aware of that yet?

I mean, I know he is away from Canada spreading some sort of imagined propaganda or other but will he not be pretty upset that Israel has taken over while he is away?

Quite apart from that, I am sure that any Canadian Parent would rather they choose what their children are exposed to and influenced by rather than leaving that to someone (Weinstein) who supports the destruction of women, children and basically unarmed men in a confined area from which they could not escape the slaughter.

Maybe I should expect a knock on my door from this Jewish Defense League, because :

a) I watched George's message beamed into Canada this week and I totally supported his convoy of relief to Gaza.

b) I do not expect my right to freedom of speech and freedom to listen to others speak in this country that I love called Canada, to be determined by a member of another country - be it Israel or the USA.

Nor do I expect a member of the Canadian Government (dysfunctional minority that it may be) to allow such rights to be determined by another country without my consent.

Obviously, they do not agree that I should have these rights and presumably you agree with them.

I do not consent to this destructive and terroristic action you are taking.

Jeremy Arney
Victoria BC

[Oscar]

Flaherty's Budget - How did it work for you. . . ?

To: Jim Flaherty
From: Jeremy Arney
Cc: Ignatieff Michael ; Layton Jack ; Duceppe Gilles ; Savoie, Denise ; Martin, Keith ; (and many newspapers...Ed.)

Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:59 PM

Subject: So how did it work for you as opposed to the Canadian people?

Mr Flaherty, Minister of Finance,

In your budget of 2006 this happened:

In his first budget as Harper's finance minister, Jim Flaherty invited "new players" -- that is, U.S financial corporations -- into Canada's mortgage insurance market and doubled the amount of government money available to back up private insurers from $100 billion to $200 billion.

Flaherty's 2006 budget states that "These changes will result in greater choice and innovation in the market for mortgage insurance, benefiting consumers and promoting home ownership." - Jim Flaherty 2006

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has observed that "financial innovation" are two words that should henceforth strike terror into the hearts of investors.

With the entrance of new private mortgage insurers into Canada after the Flaherty budget, Canada saw a dramatic weakening in the standards for mortgage insurance.

An analysis in the Toronto Star pointed out: "A 40-year mortgage [on a $350,000 home] will save you $73 a week on payments but cost an extra $254,000 in interest than if you had opted for 25 years. It's a trade-off that works way better for the bank than your personal finances."

So this didn't work too well for the Canadian People - how did it work for you, Mr Flaherty?

These quotes taken from The Tyee on 8th October 2008 in an excellent article : "How Harper Gov't pushed Financial Deregulation Here, Abroad," by Ellen Gould
http://thetyee.ca/Views/2008/10/08/HarperEcon/

Now, just a few years after that budget, we are in more trouble than you will yet acknowledge and, more than that, you are only helping those corporations that are causing the trouble.

The Canadian people are not benefiting in any meaningful way; yes, a few extra bucks for EI, but NO real help in getting the recently-fired (because of corporate downsizing as a result of the carefully manufactured economic situation) back to work.

Perhaps you are too busy now overseeing more Acts of Parliament to be meddled with (a la US method of "pork", such as giving control of all nonnavigable waterways to Harper to do with what he wants with no responsibilty to either the House of Commons or the people of Canada) in a future addendum to your "budget"

From the same article comes this very disturbing information about Harper's efforts to destroy the economies of other countries:

"The enormity of what's at stake in the WTO financial sector negotiations is revealed in a February 2006 bargaining request sent from Canada's Department of Finance to developing countries. Canada asked that foreign financial institutions be guaranteed rights to "establish new and acquire existing companies" in all financial sectors. This would mean among other things that countries would have to allow 100 per cent foreign ownership of their banks and insurance companies.

Canada has also asked that companies be given WTO enforceable rights to trade in derivatives, which has been described as a high-octane form of financial speculation similar to gambling. Warren Buffett famously called derivatives "financial weapons of mass destruction," destruction that is being witnessed on a daily basis on the world's stock exchanges."

I find it disgusting that you and Harper feel you must act as the messengers of evil for the WTO and IMF, using the name of Canada without our consent.

Did you ask for House of Commons approval in this?

For your information, I do not consent to Canada trying to destroy anyone or their country any more than I consent to the deceitful way I believe you are treating the Canadian People.

Jeremy Arney
Victoria BC