Mikisew Cree win against Harper's Omnibus Bills

Mikisew Cree win against Harper's Omnibus Bills

Postby Oscar » Tue Dec 23, 2014 5:35 pm

Council thanks the Mikisew Cree on their court win against the omnibus bills

[ http://canadians.org/blog/council-thank ... ibus-bills ]

December 23, 2014 - 10:29 am

A federal judge has ruled that the Harper government should have consulted with First Nations before introducing the omnibus bills C-38 and C-45 two years ago.

Those bills removed federal protection for hundreds of streams, rivers and tributaries to expedite the approval of resource extraction projects. Specifically, they removed federal protection for most of the waterways in the traditional territory of the Mikisew Cree in northern Alberta. In his 64-page judgement, Justice Roger Hughes wrote, "A reasonable person would expect that a reduction in the number of waterways monitored carries with it the potential risk of harm." [ http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Ottawa+w ... story.html ]

The Council of Canadians thanks the Mikisew Cree First Nation for taking the federal government to court on this issue and congratulates them on this win.

Mikisew Cree First Nation Chief Steve Courtoreille says, “Mikisew now expects the federal government and all other governments in Canada to consult with First Nations early on legislation that may adversely affect our rights. Those governments should not be afraid of us. We have valuable information and contributions to make on these important issues." [ http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Ottawa+w ... story.html ]

The Edmonton Journal reports, "Their win will not affect the legislation that is already in effect, but it requires governments to seek input from affected First Nations in the future before the bills pass. ...Previously, courts had required consultation before large physical projects such as a road or dam. This expands the requirement to higher level legislation." [ http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Ottawa+w ... story.html ]

And Jessica Clogg, senior counsel for West Coast Environmental Law, adds, "The case has the potential to fundamentally change the rules of the game. It was essentially a signal to the federal government — but really all levels of government — that they can’t proceed unilaterally with legislation that has the potential to impact on aboriginal and treaty rights." [ http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/ ... story.html ]

Council of Canadians chairperson Maude Barlow has commented, "The Harper government has dramatically undermined the safety, sovereignty and security of First Nations through the omnibus bills C-38 and C-45. The Harper government killed the Navigable Waters Protection Act with C-45, stripping protections from 99 per cent of lakes and rivers. Major pipelines and inter-provincial power lines now have the green light to cross over and under more than 31,000 lakes and 2.25 million rivers without federal scrutiny. The gutting of environmental protections is of particular concern to First Nations as many of the current and proposed new energy and mining projects take place on their lands. These changes were made without consultation with First Nations, despite their court-recognized treaty rights."

In January 2013, Barlow returned her Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee medal to the Governor-General, "As a protest over both these terrible omnibus bills, passed with no consultation with either First Nations or Canadians other than the energy industry, and [his] refusal to meet directly with First Nations as the representative of the institution with whom they signed their treaties."

The Council of Canadians offers our deepest thanks to our Indigenous allies for protecting their land, water and rights. We recognize these rights are key to stopping the Harper government's environmentally destructive, indeed planet killing, fossil fuel driven agenda. And we understand our responsibility to support First Nations, our Indigenous brothers and sisters, and the struggles for the full realization of Indigenous rights, including the right to clean drinking water and sanitation.

The Harper government has until January 19, 2015 to file an appeal against Judge Hughes' ruling.

Further reading

Mikisew Cree First Nation and Frog Lake First Nation to challenge C-38 and C-45 in Federal Court (January 2013 blog)
[ http://canadians.org/node/9107 ]


Brent Patterson’s Blog
[ http://canadians.org/blogs/brent-patterson ]
Political Director of the Cpuncil of Canadians

- - - - -
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9966
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Re: Mikisew Cree win against Harper's Omnibus Bills

Postby Oscar » Tue Dec 23, 2014 5:37 pm

Ottawa wrong to ram through omnibus budget bills: judge

[ http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Ottawa+w ... story.html ]

By Elise Stolte, Edmonton Journal December 19, 2014

EDMONTON - Ottawa should have consulted with First Nations before introducing the two omnibus bills that helped spark the widespread 2012 Idle No More protests, a federal judge ruled Friday.

Alberta’s Mikisew Cree First Nation took the Government of Canada to court over the bills. Their win will not affect the legislation that is already in effect, but it requires governments to seek input from affected First Nations in the future before the bills pass.

“It puts an obligation on governments. The duty to consult is triggered in legislative action,” said Karey Brooks of JFK Law, legal counsel for the band. “It’s a really exciting development in the law.”

Previously, courts had required consultation before large physical projects such as a road or dam. This expands the requirement to higher level legislation.

In 2012, the massive, far-reaching budget bills included changes that reduced federal protection of waterways and fish habitat, which the Mikisew have used for generations to fish, trap and travel.

“A reasonable person would expect that a reduction in the number of waterways monitored carries with it the potential risk of harm,” wrote Justice Roger Hughes. [ http://www.scribd.com/doc/250600865/Fed ... t-decision ]

The Harper government should have notified the Cree when the bills were introduced and given them an opportunity to respond, said Hughes. “In the present case, no notice was given and no opportunity to make submissions was provided. In fact, each Bill, which was structured as a ‘confidence’ Bill, went through Parliament with remarkable speed.”

MORE:
[ http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Ottawa+w ... story.html ]
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9966
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm


Return to PURE(?) POLITICS

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron