It is undemocratic to exclude me and Gary Johnson from presidential debates [
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ry-johnson ]
The overwhelming majority of Americans want to hear us debate the Republican and Democratic candidates. Will Trump and Clinton stand up for democracy?
Tuesday 6 September 2016 17.13 BST Last modified on Wednesday 7 September 2016 14.12 BST
Presidential debates should be an opportunity for the American people to decide the direction of our nation. But since 1987, everything about the debates has been predetermined by the party bosses who run Washington.
Consider that 76% of Americans want the presidential debates to include Gary Johnson and me. [
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli ... /89710228/ ] Yet the phony Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) is trying to rob voters of the open debates they want.
The CPD is actually a private corporation that refuses to disclose its current funders or sponsors. [
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Co ... al_Debates ] The Democratic and Republican National Committees both select its leaders. The CPD literally excludes the 50% of voters who reject their parties.
This two-party cartel posing as a public service “commission” admitted in a 1987 press conference that independent candidates and alternative political parties should be excluded from the debates, and they create artificial barriers to exclude them.
For example, the CPD demands that candidates poll at 15% or higher to be included in the debates. This arbitrary number was put in place the year after third-party candidate Jesse Ventura won the governorship of Minnesota. Ventura was included in debates when he was at 10% in the polls, and his performance carried him to victory. To prevent a similar upset at the national level, the CPD quickly raised the bar to the arbitrary 15% requirement.
The former president of the League of Women Voters, one of the most respected nonpartisan organizations in the country, called the commission “a fraud on the American voter”. [
http://lwv.org/press-releases/league-re ... rate-fraud ]
The CPD also keeps the debates within a narrow set of issues determined by party bosses. In 2012, the presidential debates skipped over major issues including gay rights, the war on drugs, domestic surveillance, housing and abortion. Climate change, the greatest crisis facing humankind, wasn’t mentioned even once.
Again, the League of Women Voters said it best: “It has become clear to us that the candidates’ organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.” [
http://lwv.org/press-releases/league-re ... rate-fraud ]
MORE:
[
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ry-johnson ]