Elizabeth May questions her own leadership, but some Greens say there’s no heir apparent
[ http://www.hilltimes.com/2016/08/10/eli ... L_CAMPAIGN)&goal=0_207adb2c89-d9cda8a175-90669285&mc_cid=d9cda8a175&mc_eid=37c29b0f13 ]
There was perhaps a faction of the party that voted in favour of the controversial BDS motion to spite their leader, says shadow cabinet member.
By CHELSEA NASH PUBLISHED : Wednesday, Aug. 10, 2016 12:00 AM
Elizabeth May is openly questioning her own Green party leadership after members voted to adopt a policy that she personally disagreed with, yet took much of the heat for, at the party’s convention on Sunday. But some other party members say that there’s no ready replacement if she steps down.
Though Ms. May passed a leadership review with more than 90 per cent support earlier this year, some Green Party of Canada members are unhappy with her leadership, according to shadow cabinet member Jean-Luc Cooke, the party’s small-business critic. Mr. Cooke said he could not name names at this point, “but the day may come.”
Mr. Cooke said the adoption of a controversial policy in support of boycott, divestment, and sanctions against certain Israeli institutions was something Ms. May took “personally.”
Sponsored by Green party justice critic Dimitri Lascaris and adopted by the party at its biennial convention in Ottawa on Sunday, the resolution pledges the Greens’ support for the use of divestment, boycott, and sanctions, known as BDS, targeted to “those sectors of Israel’s economy and society which profit from the ongoing occupation” of Palestinian territory.
The motion has been the target of strongly worded condemnation from several Jewish groups in Canada, including B’nai Brith Canada, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, and the Jewish National Fund.
“With the Green party’s support for unfairly singling out the world’s only Jewish state for contempt, it has firmly entrenched itself beyond the fringe of mainstream Canadian politics,” said Michael Mostyn, CEO of B’nai Brith Canada, in a statement Sunday.
Green party member Paul Manly, who is the party’s international trade critic, said the point of supporting BDS is to help bring peace to the region by sanctioning “those companies that are directly profiting off of those settlements and the illegal occupation.” Supporters argue that the Israeli government is responsible for human rights abuses against Palestinians, and that it must be held accountable. However, those on the other side, like Ms. May and Mr. Cooke, say that this policy is an unbalanced approach, and that peacekeepers do not pick sides.
Canada’s House of Commons voted in February to reject the BDS movement and call upon the government to condemn attempts by Canadian groups and individuals to promote the movement.
Others have argued that the BDS movement is a guise for anti-Semitism in specifically targeting Israel, though Ms. May said that there is no space for anti-Semitism or racism in her party, and that that wasn’t what this resolution was about.
‘A dose of masochism to be committed to this job’
In a scrum directly after the convention closed, Ms. May expressed her own difficulty with being leader of a party that she said she ultimately has no power in. When asked if she was confident in the support from her party in her leadership, she replied that the party had recently had a confidence motion online in which every party member could vote, and she received 93.6 per cent. The vote took place over a month and closed in April, with participation from 26 per cent of members, according to iPolitics.
“So…pretty confident,” she said laughing. “I’m not so confident in my own support for me staying on as leader,” she said, in a tone that was almost sarcastic.
She continued, “Well, I mean, every day I question [it]. It’s a weird thing being leader of the Green party, because as I said, the job description in our constitution and bylaws, the leader’s job is to be the chief spokesperson. So I have no power within the party. And, I obviously will take blame for things that go wrong,” she said.
She described her role as being completely different from leadership positions in other parties, because hers is one of “service leadership.”
“Sometimes [I] question if it does take a dose of masochism to be committed to this job,” she said, “But I am committed.”
She’s given other interviews in the last week further expressing her discomfort with the job, after a decade in it.
Speaking to CBC Radio on Tuesday morning, the broadcaster quoted her as saying: “I’m going away for the first week off I’ve had off since Christmas and I will be doing a lot of reflecting.”
MORE:
[ http://www.hilltimes.com/2016/08/10/eli ... L_CAMPAIGN)&goal=0_207adb2c89-d9cda8a175-90669285&mc_cid=d9cda8a175&mc_eid=37c29b0f13 ]
