Stop the Hogs!

REVIEW: Kill the Messengers — Stephen Harper’s Assault on Your Right to Know by Mark Bourrie

[ http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/bo ... eview.html ]

If ever a government wanted to shun the media, it couldn’t have picked a better era.

Kill the Messengers - Stephen Harper’s Assault on Your Right to Know by Mark Bourrie, Patrick Crean Editions, 392 pages, $32.99
View 3 photos

By: Georgie Binks Special to the Star, Published on Fri Jan 30 2015

When Mark Bourrie chose the title of his book — Kill the Messengers — he never could have predicted how frighteningly apropos it would be. With the murders in France of eight journalists at the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, along with nine other victims, the issue of freedom of speech is at the forefront of everyone’s minds.

Bourrie’s book takes direct aim at two issues — freedom of information in Canada and freedom of speech and how the Conservative government under Stephen Harper has stifled both. Taking the reader through a myriad of changes wrought by the government, Bourrie builds a solid, credible argument about how Canadians have been kept in the dark about what the government is doing. He argues that a new kind of government has emerged since the 1980s forged by what he calls “professional armies, marketers, pollsters, strategists and attack dogs.”

MORE:

[ http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/bo ... eview.html ]

Oh, Canada: Harper's systematic attack on democracy and media

[ http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/05/ ... -and-media ]

Exposing the Conservative's stranglehold on information

By Amira Elghawaby | May 7, 2015

If the state of Canada's democracy doesn't already reduce you to tears, it will once you get your hands on Mark Bourrie's latest book, Kill the Messengers: Stephen Harper's Assault on Your Right to Know. This book would be worth the time under any circumstances; in an election year, it's absolutely essential reading.
[ http://www.harpercollins.ca/97814434310 ... messengers ]

Bourrie, a journalist and historian specializing in military, media, and propaganda, is as thorough as he is focused in his meticulous analysis of the Conservative Party's tightening hold on information and its impact on our institutions.

Bourrie starts off where many authors often do when scrutinizing Prime Minister Stephen Harper's raison d'être: making Canada unrecognizable. This entails ensuring Canadians see the country "in a different light: as an energy and resource superpower instead of a country of factories and businesses, as 'warrior nation' instead of a peacekeeper, as an Arctic nation instead of clusters of cities along the American border, as a country of self-reliant entrepreneurs instead of a nation that shares among its people and its regions."

We know all this. But the genius in this tome is how carefully the author catalogues and analyzes the ways in which Harper has systematically attacked Canada's democratic institutions and the media to bring about this drastic transformation. From avoiding the parliamentary press corps, to doing away with facts and science, to reshaping the country's history and perceptions of itself, Bourrie chronicles just how Harper has been able to do the unimaginable -- and get away with it.

As those who've been on the front lines of this battle can attest, it hasn't been pretty. Take Munir Sheikh for example. He's the former Chief Statistician of Canada who resigned his post to protest the federal government's decision to cancel the long-form census. In 2013, Sheikh noted:

"At a personal level, Canadians make decisions every day based on evidence. They look at mortgage rates before deciding whether, and where, to get a mortgage. They look at food prices to determine what to buy and how much. They look at the job market in various parts of the country to decide whether to move or not. Now imagine all of this happening without citizens and governments paying attention to an evidence-based analysis of the issues: the Bank of Canada not interested in understanding why the inflation target is important; the federal government not realizing why it should or should not cut corporate taxes; and citizens not thinking about what high mortgage rates, high food prices, and job opportunities could do to their well-being. Without appropriate evidence-based analysis, we will all be poorer -- in every sense of the word."

Does less information make us poorer? If that's true, we've been robbed. "[Harper] had to get rid of objective data from the census and from scientists so no one could challenge his narratives on crime, the environmental damage caused by resource exploitation, the extent of climate change or anything else that's complex," explains Bourrie.

MORE:

[ http://rabble.ca/books/reviews/2015/05/ ... -and-media ]