MB Hog Production: WP Letter "Missed the Mark"

MB Hog Production: WP Letter "Missed the Mark"

Postby Oscar » Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:55 am

Missed the mark

[ http://www.producer.com/2017/11/letters ... er-2-2017/ ]

Posted Nov. 2nd, 2017

In The Western Producer article Hog Production Protest Misses the Mark (Oct. 12), I think it is more a question of the journalist in question seriously missing the point. [ http://www.producer.com/2017/10/hog-pro ... -the-mark/

The reality is that there is a wide diversity of groups and individuals with serious concerns about the prospect of the ramping up of industrial style hog production as it is practised in Manitoba, with many good reasons.

The whole package of “red tape reductions” proposed by the Pallister government extends beyond Bill 24 and the changes to the Environment Act to also include a rewrite of the Livestock Mortalities and Manure Management Regulation and the building code relating to hog barn construction.

The journalist chose to ignore the substantive issues that these changes bring forward, in favour of parroting the oft repeated, meaningless and unsubstantiated claims by the industry of “the most stringent manure management regulations in North America” and “if all the hog barns in Manitoba were gone tomorrow about one to two percent less phosphorus would flow into Lake Winnipeg.”

(Editor’s note: The opinion piece that appeared on our website noted that the estimate comes from Don Flaten, University of Manitoba soil scientist and nutrient management expert.)

I will pick three issues of concern. Firstly, there is the appalling record this industry has with respect to barn fires and the concerns around animal welfare and ethical production practices.

Since 2002, over 80,000 pigs have been incinerated in barn fires in Manitoba. Worse yet, the numbers rose substantially at the times when the industry was losing money.

Only three cases were proven arson, but then I can imagine the difficulty of making that determination after the fact. All the while the hog industry was howling for government bailouts, which they got.

Now as part of the red tape changes, the building code has been rolled back, requiring no dedicated firefighting pond, fewer firewall separations, and fewer fire retardant coverings, consigning thousands more pigs to a brutal and fiery death going forward.

Secondly, yes let’s talk about phosphorus and Lake Winnipeg. Many Manitobans are deeply concerned about the ever deteriorating state of our big lake.

Lake Winnipeg has the dubious distinction as the most eutrophic of the world’s 10 largest fresh-water lakes.

The reality is that we simply don’t know how big the hog industry is in contributing to this problem.

In 2007 the Clean Environment Commission report, entitled Environmental Sustainability and Hog Production in Manitoba, made a call for immediate research into soil test phosphorus and the mechanisms by which it gets into surface watercourses and groundwater

That was 10 years ago and the called-for research has not happened to date.

In “Hog Alley” (the rural municipalities of Hanover and La Broquerie), we have serious issues of soil phosphorus loading. The law currently allows manure application to continue up to a threshold level of 180 p.p.m. soil phosphorus — way beyond anything that makes agronomic sense.

Other jurisdictions have clearly shown that the soil’s ability to retain phosphorus diminishes rapidly at these levels. Let’s do the research there and get some sound science on the subject.

My third example is the air-quality issue. This has both an environmental (climate change) component as well as the obvious social one.

Hog barn operators strongly resist the use of covers on lagoons. The reason is simple — without covers they can vent off the ammonia, methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide and reduce the spread acres required by as much as 30 percent. It’s cheaper.

In the U.S., intensive livestock operations are recognized as the primary source of ammonia emissions to the atmosphere.

Again, the 10-year old Clean Environment Commission report proposed negative pressure synthetic covers be required on all lagoons. It is no longer socially acceptable to make such an unmitigated stink, even in our rural areas.

At the council decision meeting with respect to a recent barn proposal, one councillor made the profound statement: “There are just too many families that will be affected by this.” Enough said. Needless to say the proposal was summarily declined.

Why would I care about all this? Well, I have had the opportunity to live and farm one mile downwind of one of these operations for the last 15 years. It has been a learning experience — one we do not need to repeat.

As for (Robert) Arnason’s column, I would suggest he go back to journalism school. Learn to leave his personal biases at the door. Do the necessary investigative groundwork to fully comprehend the issues at stake. Present a balanced perspective on the issues at hand. We used to expect better from The Western Producer.

Jon Crowson,
Oak River, Man.

= = = = =

Hog production protest misses the mark

[ http://www.producer.com/2017/10/hog-pro ... -the-mark/ ]

Posted Oct. 12th, 2017 by Robert Arnason

In my 15 years as a journalist, I’ve spoken to more than 150 people who lead environmental groups and animal welfare organizations in Canada.

It’s difficult to tell over the phone, but my instincts tell me that most of these folks are good people. They sincerely believe in their causes, saving bees or halting the logging of trees, and they genuinely want to make a difference.

But a rally in Winnipeg October 11, hosted by groups that oppose hog production in Manitoba, exposed a devious side of Canada’s activist industry.

About 50 Manitobans, including several politicians from the provincial NDP, gathered to protest government changes that will reduce and simplify manure management regulations in the province.

Manitoba’s pork industry has been stuck in neutral for about ten years because restrictive regulations made it too expensive to construct new hog barns.

One of the regulations, developed under the former NDP government, required new hog barns to have an anaerobic digester to treat the manure. Producers pegged the cost of a digester at $1 million, pushing the cost of a new build into the stratosphere. On top of that, manure management experts said the devices would have done nothing to control phosphorus.

Thanks to such regulations, less than five new barns have been built in Manitoba over the last decade. In comparison 200 or 250 new barns are constructed every year in Iowa.

Manitoba’s hog sector, which contributes $1.7 billion to the provincial economy every year, desperately needs to replace aging barns built in the 1990s. It’s expected the industry will make the necessary investments and begin building when the regulatory changes take force. Even with the changes, the province will continue to have some of the most stringent manure management regulations in North America, according to the Manitoba Pork Council.

The Wilderness Committee, a citizen funded environmental group, organized the October 11 protest rally in Winnipeg.

The group promoted the rally as an effort to protect Lake Winnipeg from the proposed regulatory changes.

Hog Watch, an environmental and animal welfare group, also participated in the event.

The two groups claim that the new rules and new hog barns will cause more phosphorus to flow into Lake Winnipeg, threatening the health of a lake already loaded with nutrients.

But speakers at the event touched lightly on that issue.

Instead, they talked about the evils of “industrial hog production” and how Canada would be better off if all pig farms were organic. Others said Manitoba would be an agricultural paradise if all farms were 20 acres in size and if the handful of livestock on the farm were kept outside, as nature intended. And others held up signs saying “bacon=suffering.”

What everyone forgot to mention, is how much phosphorus flows into Lake Winnipeg because of manure from hog barns.

Don Flaten, University of Manitoba soil scientist and nutrient management expert, said earlier this year that if all the hogs in Manitoba disappeared it would barely make a difference.

If all the hog barns in Manitoba were gone tomorrow about one to two percent less phosphorus would flow into Lake Winnipeg, Flaten estimated.

The folks at the October 11 rally, to protest environmental rule changes that supposedly threaten Lake Winnipeg, didn’t mention Flaten or other research showing the fractional contribution of the hog industry.

That’s because it’s beside the point.

Their point is pretty simple: they don’t like the idea of raising pigs in barns, they don’t like companies or farmers that profit from hog production and they don’t like idea of raising livestock for meat.

Which is all fine.

If someone doesn’t like something in Canada, they have a right to say so.

But be honest and hold a rally to express your genuine feelings. Organize an event to protest the consumption of meat. Hold an animal welfare rally against the “industrial production” of pork.

Don’t pretend that you and your group are protecting the planet from hog industry evildoers, who are deliberately poisoning Lake Winnipeg.

If one to two percent or even four percent of the phosphorus entering the lake comes from hog manure, you have no cause to wave your fist at hog farmers or the provincial government.

If you’re gonna wave your fist, don’t wave it at X to protest Y.

Otherwise, the public and journalists stop taking you seriously.
- - -
Contact robert.arnason@producer.com
Site Admin
Posts: 8698
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Return to Factory Production of Animals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest