The State of Nuclear

The State of Nuclear

Postby Oscar » Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:33 pm

The state of nuclear

Nuclear power, and Canada’s uranium industry, are struggling to find their place in a green energy future

[ https://magazine.cim.org/en/news/2020/t ... uclear-en/ ]

March 23, 2020

On Jan. 7, 2020 NuScale Power submitted its small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) design to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission for a pre-licensing vendor design review. This came just over a month after the leaders of three Canadian provinces – Ontario premier Doug Ford, New Brunswick premier Blaine Higgs and Saskatchewan premier Scott Moe – signed a memorandum of understanding to develop SMRs in their respective provinces.

These developments align with the International Energy Agency (IEA) analysis that nuclear is an essential component to clean power generation. According to the IEA, nuclear electricity generation has replaced about 55 gigatonnes of CO2 emissions over the last half century and is second to hydro for low-carbon power generated globally. Given the demanding carbon emission reduction targets required to satisfy the Paris Agreement, nuclear power would seem to be poised for growth, and Canada entering into a collaboration with the United States to secure supply lines for several critical minerals, uranium included reinforces that idea.

That would be good news for the uranium industry, as Canada is the world’s second-largest producer of the fuel source for these powerplants. But Cameco, the country’s largest uranium company, suspended production indefinitely at its flagship MacArthur River/Key Lake mine in July 2018, and the spot price of uranium is one-third of what it was back in 2011. That was before the meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi reactor in Japan, when an earthquake and tsunami triggered the release of radioactive materials.

In 2018, supply and demand became more balanced, but only as a result of “substantial production cuts, cuts to some secondary supplies, reductions in inventories and an increase in demand for uranium,” said Rachelle Girard, vice-president of investor relations for Cameco. “Despite these improvements, it is no secret that today’s uranium market remains discretionary.”

Many nuclear reactors in Japan remain shut down following the Fukushima meltdown and countries such as Germany and South Korea are proceeding with nuclear phase-out programs in favour of alternative sources of energy, such as natural gas. The IEA agency projects that without a major turnaround in plant construction and refurbishments, nuclear power generation will continue to decline, making the share of energy required from renewable sources even larger than it would otherwise be. Currently, the phase out of nuclear has offset the gains in low-carbon energy output from sources such as wind and solar, meaning the share of power generated by “clean” energy is the same as it was in 2000.

“The main problem with nuclear… is that it’s too slow and too costly,” said Gordon Edwards, co-founder of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility. “It takes too long to get new nuclear implanted. You’re looking at 10 to 20 years, even with one of these small modular reactors – and the cost is prohibitive. Other [options] are both much faster and much cheaper, the first and foremost of those being greater energy efficiency.”

MORE . . . .
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Return to Uranium/Nuclear/Waste

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron