STUDY: Wi-Fi More Dangerous to Kids Than Previously Thought

STUDY: Wi-Fi More Dangerous to Kids Than Previously Thought

Postby Oscar » Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:21 am

Study Suggests Wi-Fi Exposure More Dangerous To Kids Than Previously Thought

[ http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertszcze ... y-thought/ ]

Robert J. Szczerba, Contributor - I explore the intersection of healthcare, technology, and business. [ Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. ]

Tech 1/13/2015 @ 7:55 AM

Most parents would be concerned if their children had significant exposure to lead, chloroform, gasoline fumes, or the pesticide DDT. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IRIC), part of the United Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO), classifies these and more than 250 other agents as Class 2B Carcinogens. Another entry on that same list is radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF/EMF). The main sources of RF/EMF are radios, televisions, microwave ovens, cell phones, and Wi-Fi devices.

Uh-oh. Not another diatribe about the dangers of our modern communication systems? Obviously, these devices and the resulting fields are extremely (and increasingly) common in modern society. Even if we want to, we can’t eliminate our exposure, or our children’s, to RF/EMF. But, we may need to limit that exposure, when possible.

That was among the conclusions of a report published in the Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure entitled “Why children absorb more microwave radiation than adults: The consequences.” From an analysis of peer-reviewed studies, the authors argue that children and adolescents are at considerable risk from devices that radiate microwaves (and that adults are at a lower, but still significant, risk).

The following points were made:

•Children absorb a greater amount of microwave radiation than adults.
•Fetuses are even more vulnerable than children. Therefore pregnant women should avoid exposing their fetus to microwave radiation.
•Adolescent girls and women should not place cellphones in their bras or in hijabs (headscarf).
•Cellphone manual warnings make clear an overexposure problem exists.
•Government warnings have been issued but most of the public are unaware of such warnings.
•Current exposure limits are inadequate and should be revised.
•Wireless devices are radio transmitters, not toys. Selling toys that use them should be monitored more closely, or possibly even banned.

Children and fetuses absorb more microwave radiation, according to the authors, because their bodies are relatively smaller, their skulls are thinner, and their brain tissue is more absorbent.

More generally, the studies cited in the paper found RF/EMF exposure is linked to cancers of the brain and salivary glands, ADHD, low sperm count, and, among girls who keep cell phones in their bra, breast cancer. They also noted that the average time between exposure to a carcinogen and a resultant tumor is three or more decades.

Hopefully, more longitudinal studies will be done to verify or contradict the findings so far. In the meantime, are the government’s current regulations adequate? The exposure levels they warn against haven’t seem to have been updated for more than 19 years.

MORE:

[ http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertszcze ... y-thought/ ]
Oscar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8651
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Return to Health/MEDICARE

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron