Backgrounder - Research in the public eye: Engaged academic research and the ‘right to know’ - - [
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=r ... PartId=0.1 ]
Peter W.B. Phillips © 2024 by Peter W.B. Phillips - Published June 15, 2024
Centre for the Study of Science and Innovation Policy (CSIP)
101 Diefenbaker Place, Saskatoon, Canada, S7N 5B8
[
www.scienceandinnovationpolicy.ca ]
----
EXCERPT:Preface
The journal Issues in Science and Technology, published by the US National Academy of Sciences and
Arizona State University, published in June 2024 a piece I wrote on a controversy I become entangled
with over the past decade.
Phillips, Peter WB. 2024. Preparing Researchers for an Era of Freer Information. Issues in
Science and Technology.
www.issues.orgAs the editors and I worked through the piece, much of the personal detail of the story was removed. For
completeness, I offer the following as background to the story.
Peter W.B. Phillips, Distinguished University Professor Emeritus
Saskatoon, Canada
- - -
Backgrounder - Research in the public eye: Engaged academic research and the ‘right to know’Peter WB Phillips
Distinguished Professor, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy
University of Saskatchewan
If you Google my name with the phrase ‘Monsanto’, you will find a series of allegations that my scholarly work is unduly influenced by corporations and that I have engaged secretly in promoting genetically modified organisms (GMOs). It is not and I have not. My experience offers an insight into the challenges of scholars working on matters of public interest. The roots of my story date to 2013 when I was co-principal investigator of a project entitled Value Addition through Genomics and GE3LS (VALGEN), an internationally peer reviewed C$5.4 million Genome Canada grant administered by Genome Prairie.2
My team was funded to explore governance of the suite of new biotechnologies being used in modern plant breeding. Beginning in the 1980s scientists in universities, industry and government developed and transferred gene-splicing tools
into a range of applications, including plants, animals and microbes. Health and environmental applications are largely welcomed but those for the agricultural and food system raise significant concern for some. GM seeds, first used commercially in 1995, mostly offer insect resistance or herbicide tolerance. ISAAA3 estimates that by 2018 (the latest data), 26 countries spanning six continents produced one or more GM crops (mostly maize, soybeans, cotton and canola) on an estimated 192 million hectares, while another 44 countries imported and consumed GM foodstuffs. An estimated 17 million farmers, 95% from developing countries, have gained an estimated US$186 billion in economic benefits from cultivating GM seeds over the past 22 years, and the ecological footprint of those crops is lower than crops based on older production methods, but there has been significant pushback against GMOs. Many countries ban cultivation or import while civil society has engaged in more than 20 years of campaigning against the technology based on concerns about its economic, environmental, health and ethical impacts. These campaigns have involved protests, destruction of seed trials, lobbying, petitions, plebiscites, ballot propositions, litigation and, most recently, freedom of information requests of public academics. . . . ."
More . . . [
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=r ... PartId=0.1 ]