Victory! RM Council unanimously denies rezoning

Victory! RM Council unanimously denies rezoning

Postby Oscar » Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:33 pm

Victory! RM Council unanimously denies rezoning

[ https://fortunemineralsconcern.wordpres ... -rezoning/ ]

By Clean Water on March 25, 2019

Today, March 25 2019 the RM of Corman Park Council heard Fortune Minerals’ rezoning application at the regular Council meeting. Information was presented by the RM’s Senior Planner; followed by David Henry, Ann Coxworth and Peter Prebble of the Saskatchewan Environmental Society; and then dairy farmer Calvin Vaandrager of the local Citizens Concerned about Fortune Minerals group. A petition against the development with 2644 signatures was delivered by local resident Norm Grier.

The motion to deny the rezoning was moved by Councillor Joanne Janzen and seconded by Councillor Wendy Trask. Reeve Judy Harwood then called the question. All Councillors raised their hands immediately. Reeve Harwood said “There you have your answer – the vote is unanimous.” Fortune Minerals’ rezoning application has been denied.

Thanks to the RM Council for your votes in favour of a healthy and safe future for our community. Thanks to everyone who has been involved for all of your hard work to protect our water, our land, our air, and our future generations!
Site Admin
Posts: 9204
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Re: Victory! RM Council unanimously denies rezoning

Postby Oscar » Wed Mar 27, 2019 3:15 pm

R.M. of Corman Park rejects Fortune Minerals refinery near Saskatoon

[ ... -1.5072259 ]

Locals concerned refinery waste would contaminate groundwater; Environment Minister believes it's safe

David Shield · CBC News · Posted: Mar 26, 2019 12:51 PM CT | Last Updated: March 26

A drawing of a proposed Fortune Minerals refinery that was proposed for a site near the town of Langham. (Fortune Minerals)

In a unanimous decision, councillors in the Rural Municipality of Corman Park have voted against a controversial metal refinery project proposed in the Saskatoon area.

Fortune Minerals has been talking about building a refinery near the town of Langham, Sask. for years now. The refinery would process ore that would come from a proposed mine in the Northwest Territories and generate metals like cobalt, gold, bismuth and copper sulphate.

However, at a meeting on Monday, the R.M. council voted against the proposal, stating that the project was not a good fit for the area.

"I've got very capable councillors," said reeve Judy Harwood. "They did their homework. We certainly had a lot of contact from our ratepayers of what what their wishes were."

People in the area were mainly concerned about waste storage facilities that would permanently hold the waste rock generated by the refinery.

Environmentalists, as well as local farmers, were worried arsenic and other chemicals could potentially escape the ponds and contaminate the local aquifer.

"One of the big problems with this proposal was that it was going to leave behind a legacy of large volumes of arsenic-laced waste that were basically going to be permanently located at the site," said Saskatchewan Environmental Society board member Peter Prebble.

The project had been controversial among locals for years, with protesters regularly attending local town hall meetings on the project.

The provincial Ministry of Environment had already signed off on the project, stating it believed the company's waste storage plan was safe.

Other plans in works, company says

The site would have generated 158,000 tonnes of waste per year, and wastewater would be injected more than 800 metres underground, far below the aquifer.

In a news release, Fortune Minerals said it had already begun working on alternate plans if the R.M. voted against the proposals. It said the company was already looking for other sites in Saskatchewan and other jurisdictions.

The company is also considering selling ore from its planned NICO mine in the Northwest Territories directly to other refining companies, negating the need to build its own processing plant.

According to Fortune Minerals, the refinery would employ between 80 to 90 full-time employees and run for 20 years.

It also expected construction contracts worth $76 million during construction, with annual operational costs of $25 million.

However, Reeve Hawood said the R.M. is not concerned with the loss of the business.

"This is probably a good project and I wish them well," she said. "But it's just the location was not ideal."

Fortune Minerals aims to sell its cobalt as a component of lithium ion batteries, a key component in electrical generation from wind and solar energy.

In January, the company signed a document with the territorial government that laid out targets for Indigenous employment and spending on training and education at the NICO mine.


•Fortune Minerals considers putting Saskatoon-area refinery plans on ice - July 18, 2018
[ ... -1.4751960 ]

•Langham group campaigns against Fortune Minerals plant - November 27, 2013
[ ... -1.2440867 ]

•Fortune Minerals hosts heated public meeting in Langham - February 20, 2014
[ ... -1.2544259 ]
Site Admin
Posts: 9204
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Return to LANGHAM, SK - Another Toxic Time Bomb

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests